The Sebring 12 hours was dominated – not entirely
unexpectedly – by the Safety Car. In all, 5h 04m were spent under full course
caution, in a total of eleven separate periods. At one point, the red flag was
waved, and cars came to a complete halt on the Ullman Straight while the debris
from the accident between David Ostella (Oreca no. 38) and Frankie Montecalvo (Oreca no.
52) was cleared up.
In the end, the winning Chip Ganassi entry, in the hands of
Marino Franchitti, Memo Rojas and Scott Pruett came home the winner, but that
was largely down to luck: although the efforts of Franchitti to keep the
Riley-Ford in the lead for the last twenty minutes were indeed impressive, the car was only in that position due to its slightly higher fuel consumption
requiring it to stop earlier than its competition, and the final Safety Car
period coming at just the right time for the team and entirely changing the
complexion of a race that was in some ways a fine strategic battle.
The Safety Car disruption meant that only three periods in
the race were long enough for cars to use more than a tank of fuel, as shown in
the table below:
From lap
|
To lap
|
From Time
|
To time
|
Period
|
22
|
52
|
11:34
|
12:30
|
56m
|
133
|
199
|
16:34
|
18:40
|
2h 06m
|
228
|
271
|
20:03
|
21:25
|
1h 21m
|
I thought it might be interesting to look at what happened
in the race, based solely on the lap times recorded during these periods, and
the results – unsurprisingly – bear little resemblance to the actual race
results.
In the prototype class, the results were:
Pos | No. | Car | Laps completed | Time | Pit stops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 42 | Oak Morgan-Nissan | 131 | 4h 19m 27.179s | 5 |
2 | 5 | Corvette DP | 131 | 4h 19m 40.927s | 5 |
3 | 1 | ESM HPD-Honda | 131 | 4h 19m 52.695s | 5 |
4 | 02 | Ganassi Riley-Ford | 131 | 4h 20m 55.253s | 6 |
5 | 2 | ESM HPD-Honda | 131 | 4h 20m 58.920s | 5 |
6 | 01 | Ganassi Riley-Ford | 131 | 4h 21m 19.503s | 6 |
I am not sure what, if anything, this all proves. Possibly that
the race leaders in the United SportsCar Championship races do not push on as
hard as they possibly can, knowing that any lead that they do establish will be
eroded as soon as the next Safety Car appears. In any case, it is
certainly interesting that the Oak P2-spec car was consistently quicker than
any other, and also that the Extreme Speed HPD also came within a whisker of
winning the race overall.
The balance of P2 and DP is probably about right, therefore, at least at Sebring. I suspect Daytona was probably somewhat extreme.
In the GT-LM class, the “All-Green” (using the same periods
as above) race result looks like this:
From which the most evident thing is that this form of racing provides opportunities for recovery drives like no other - but then again, it was ever thus: racing for a team to exploit regulations, despite various setbacks. Hats off to the RLL BMW crew for getting back onto the class podium, despite losing two laps under green racing conditions!
Pos | No. | Car | Laps completed | Time | Pit stops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | Corvette C7.R | 126 | 4h 20m 31.371s | 4 |
2 | 3 | Corvette C7.R | 126 | 4h 20m 44.205s | 4 |
3 | 912 | Works Porsche 911 RSR | 126 | 4h 21m 10.127s | 5 |
4 | 93 | SRT Viper | 126 | 4h 21m 59.109s | 5 |
5 | 17 | Falken Porsche 911 RSR | 124 | 4h 19m 31.789s | 4 |
6 | 55 | BMW Z4 GTE | 124 | 4h 22m 03.797s | 10 |
From which the most evident thing is that this form of racing provides opportunities for recovery drives like no other - but then again, it was ever thus: racing for a team to exploit regulations, despite various setbacks. Hats off to the RLL BMW crew for getting back onto the class podium, despite losing two laps under green racing conditions!
Hi Paul great read.interested in you views on Toyota improvement during the coming wec.
ReplyDeleteregatds